Since the 18th-century technological advances have replaced people in the workplace. With today’s technology, this process is happening at a greater rate. Technology is increasingly responsible for unemployment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that the evolution of technology has led to a drastic change in the way manpower is utilized, but development in technology does not encourage unemployment. However, there is a definitive change in the type of jobs current industries offer. Due to this factor, a big pool of unwanted labours get shed-off.
It is totally an agreed fact that most of the major and frequent jobs of 18th and 19th century do not exist in the current employment market. For example: digging coal mines. Earlier, back in the days when the fuel ignited machinery was not a convenient part of manufacturing and production, all the major coal mine corporations used to hire a large amount of physically well fit labour was hired to dig deep into the land for coal. This job required good physical strength, ability to work the hammer, pulling carts and bearing extreme weather. Though this job was an honest day's pay, it also had its drawbacks and the most concerning one out of them were the risk of human life. Many died or succumbed to their injuries in this line of the profession when they encountered accidents.
This issue was eradicated by introducing the use of drilling machinery, cranes and bulldozers. They served the purpose of drilling the ground, lifting the heavy material and breaking the hard stuff respectively. Surely, this resulted in a massive drop-down in the employment of physical labour for digging purposes, but it also assured a safer and much more reliable source of production for all humans in general. Also, it created employment in the field of machinery manufacturing like engineers, artisans, drivers etc.
To sum up, the advancement in technology does cut off a few job roles from the market, but it also creates safer, easier and interesting jobs parallel across the industries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | geetha balasubramaniam | 84 | view |
- Many people believe that social networking sites (facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree. 56
- You borrowed some books from your college library Unfortunately you have to go to visit a sick relative and cannot return the books on time write a letter to the library Explain what has happened Tell them what you want to do about it Ask if late charges 81
- Many young people are leaving their homes in rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons?Do the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages? 56
- Write a letter to the manager of your local bus service. They have recently made some changes to the bus services which created inconveniences for you. In your letter, explain:What are the changes? What are the problems you are facing? What part of the se 73
- Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy (wind energy and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative developmen 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that the evolution of technol...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for example, in general, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99671052632 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80562409732 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9448069848 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11236727912 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365105342578 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347294696897 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668444992824 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186208605445 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.