Advances in technology & automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

Essay topics:

Advances in technology & automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

With the advent of technology and automation has impacted human life significantly. Irrefutable to say that technology has brought a convincing and a considerable change in reducing the physical employment and labor extensive jobs. this thorny issue has raised a bone of contention. however, I radically agree with the stated statement.
Firstly, in this computerized and digitized era, technology has replaced all the labor-intensive jobs and owing to this error occurrences has reduced considerably. For instance, in earlier days, bankers were supposed to make manual entries for all the transactions before one could leave for the day. however, this is not anymore an existing story. Every bank has now upgraded to a software which calculates all the entries with just a single click. Moreover, in the pre-compute era, the cashier had to work manually and check ledger books, verify a person’s identity before paying him. Hence, reduction in working errors seems quite logical.
Secondly, less working hours means more productivity which in turn, means working more efficiently which results in a good work-life balance. A good work life balance means one can get some free time with his family and can have leisure time to enjoy or to support his family financially. For instance, in a survey recently conducted by the Economic times, people now a days are enjoying their family time as compared to people who worked in pre-computer era.
To sum up, technology and automation has influenced a human life drastically but in a positive manner since it has helped in working more proficiently and reducing the human errors. Also, it helps company in retaining its better performing employees who can generate more output.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-12 nishabhan 78 view
Essays by user nishabhan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...al employment and labor extensive jobs. this thorny issue has raised a bone of conte...
^^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... issue has raised a bone of contention. however, I radically agree with the stated stat...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ons before one could leave for the day. however, this is not anymore an existing story....
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
... quite logical. Secondly, less working hours means more productivity which in turn, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...conducted by the Economic times, people now a days are enjoying their family time as compa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ucted by the Economic times, people now a days are enjoying their family time as compa...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...influenced a human life drastically but in a positive manner since it has helped in working more pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93760599562 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6902615444 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222428787907 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681042807294 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359284543705 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125468060481 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437799593645 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.