All cars that burn fossil fuel should be banned and should be replaced by electric cars. Do you agree or disagree?
It is often said that all cars that burn fossil fuel should be banned and should be replaced by electric cars. In my opinion, I disagree with the statement because electric cars will be costly and everyone cannot afford/afford it.
Firstly, Replacing fossil fuel cars/with electric cars will be expensive to manufacture. In fact Fossil fuel cars are easy to assemble and have a good market value in the existing period all over the world. There is also the availability of manpower in the manufacturing and production unit and there is huge positive economical involvement. For example, Japan produces millions of fossil fuel cars throughout the year and take part in export all over the world. Therefore, these business activities can have a strong upward impact on the overall global economy.
secondly, fossil fuel cars are affordable for middle-class people. Everyone who has/has a minimum level of income can afford it because of its maintenance cost. The body parts are also available to get and also they are at a reasonable price. For travelling,/these fossil fuel cars are very cheap to afford. In fact, a person can drive 10 hours for only 10 dollars which are/are cheaper than electric cars. Electric cars are not easy to afford because its high in price and its maintenance cost is very high too.
In conclusion, I disagree with the statement that the vehicles that burn out fossil fuel should be banned and replaced by electric vehicles because electric vehicles are costly to produce and manufacturer and it is not affordable to buy for everyone. If possible we can think of different ways or methods to reduce the burning of fossil fuel from cars by improving and developing new techniques and generate new ideas in the existing cars.
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries, especially in rich countries. Discuss ways to solve the problem. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Computers have made the world a better place to live Do you agree or disagree with the statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 86
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 87
- Discuss effect of Materialism and Consumerism in the individuals and society 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...act on the overall global economy. secondly, fossil fuel cars are affordable for mi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , /
...re at a reasonable price. For travelling,/these fossil fuel cars are very cheap to...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fossil' or 'these fossils'?
Suggestion: this fossil; these fossils
... at a reasonable price. For travelling,/these fossil fuel cars are very cheap to afford. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98299319728 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74420664148 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513605442177 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1863856804 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447198780727 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162766723463 0.084324248473 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18148965199 0.0667982634062 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328116503753 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160058741314 0.056905535591 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...act on the overall global economy. secondly, fossil fuel cars are affordable for mi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , /
...re at a reasonable price. For travelling,/these fossil fuel cars are very cheap to...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fossil' or 'these fossils'?
Suggestion: this fossil; these fossils
... at a reasonable price. For travelling,/these fossil fuel cars are very cheap to afford. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98299319728 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74420664148 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513605442177 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1863856804 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447198780727 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162766723463 0.084324248473 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18148965199 0.0667982634062 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328116503753 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160058741314 0.056905535591 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.