Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment, but population and education as well.
What problems will your country face in the next ten years?
How can these problems be overcome?
Two days ago, I read a newspaper article about impending difficulties that nations may face in the upcoming decade. In the article, some social workers state that growing countries, such as Kazakhstan, may encounter numerous barriers in their development. In this essay, I will describe some of these obstacles and suggest possible solutions.
Let us start with the challenges that Kazakhstan will have to deal in the following ten years. The first problem is that it will face a water shortage. The country frequently allows manufacturers to pollute rivers as well as lakes with toxic waste, because it benefits the economic development, but the water contamination will ultimately force authorities to supply the whole population with potable water. Another probable complication is that it will experience a decrease in the number of its citizens. Even though now a thousand of families annually immigrate to economically prosperous countries, such as Russia and China, in ten years this number is expected to grow to by 80 percent, which means that the country will eventually face demographic crisis. Therefore, after the analysis of these problems, it is clear that Kazakhstan will have to deal with serious barriers in the future.
However, some social workers believe that the nation is capable to solve these problems by taking the following actions. Firstly, they advise to impose aquatic restrictions on industries. The way forward would be for the government to force industries to install water filters, so that they rarely contaminate this valuable resource. Secondly, they recommend to increase standard of living. To address the problem with mass immigration, officials should both raise the minimum wage by three times and provide unemployed people with high-paid jobs, so that potential immigrants would like to stay in the country. As a result, after the consideration of these solutions, it is obvious that it is possible to handle these complications.
In conclusion, although Kazakhstan will possible experience these problems in the following decade, I think it is feasible to tackle them by taking the above mentioned steps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | Ankita7443 | 84 | view |
- Most artists earn low salaries and therefore should receive fundings from the government in order for them to continue with their work.To what extent do you agree 73
- What are the pros and cons of using public transport? 84
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching television? 73
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 143, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imposing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: imposing
...following actions. Firstly, they advise to impose aquatic restrictions on industries. The...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40236686391 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92954988451 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6936737032 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236107319823 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715293440548 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602785958921 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122866605614 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683942529224 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.