With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised to access to the internet in order to meet and chat with their friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What solutions can you suggest to deal with the problem?
With the proliferation of technology and social media sites, an increasing number of youngsters is being permitted unsupervised access to the internet for interacting with their friends. This trend can have adverse consequences on the youth of the society. I believe parental control and application developers’ censor role are key measures to cope up with this issue.
The best way to solve the problem of dire consequences of children’s free access to the internet is the parental control. Firstly, parents should fix the hours being spend on the social media by every member of the family. This restriction of usage will not only increase family interaction but will also prevent children from killing time on mobile screens rather than doing something productive. Secondly, parents should motivate kids to indulge in sports activities with their friends. This in turn means that they can meet their friends in the grounds and play together; thereby keeping themselves physically fit by being in touch with their friends. In these ways, the nurturer can make sure that their kids are not being exploited by the technology.
The other solution to this grave issue is in the hands of the software developers. They should understand their social responsibility and implement diligent censor controls on the content that is being exposed to the internet users, so that children do not get access to any inappropriate content. Steps have already being taken in this regard and more public awareness is needed. For instance, Facebook, the most popular social media platform, has recently launched a Messenger App offering video and text chats for kids below an age of 10. Parents can supervise their offspring’s activities on the messenger simply through their own Facebook accounts. This way parents can allow their children an un-intervened access to chat with their friends, and at the same time can monitor the content and contacts of their kids’ App.
To recapitulate, youth is the future of our country and to prevent them from falling prey to the wide world of internet, parents should exercise control on the media access by their kids. Application developers should also add more censor controls to limit the access of obscene contents to the children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-20 | Ronald88 | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-07 | krvchanakya | 73 | view |
- There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measurements will be needed. Discuss both sides. 84
- Prevention is better than cure. Research and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree? 84
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness. Why is happiness difficult to define? How can people achieve happiness? 78
- News plays an important part of most people’s lives. Why is news so important to people? Why is so much news dedicated to bad news? Should the news focus on good news instead? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26775956284 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81899958091 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2569373599 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.411764706 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308602874077 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992090739173 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673808010843 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199490469464 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507695049412 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.