Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels

Nowadays, people all around the world from different cultures tend to follow the same habits and lifestyles and getting closer to each other. Although it may cause destroy some values, which heritage from our ancestors' thousands of years, the whole words go to a standardized and harmonized in different matters. In my opinion, this movement helps to build an integrated, united world, which makes lives easier.
The main challenge may people will face, according to eliminating differences and moving to the unity, is to lose of their own cultures, styles, varieties, and even food habits. The proliferation of TV commercials, sponsored by big companies, is encouraging people around the world to use a certain type of food, clothing, and lifestyle because of their appeal. For example, huge food companies like Mc Donald, King burger, and KFC encouraging people to have fast foods instead of healthy homemade cocked foods. Therefore, this gradual change may eradicate some parts of our culture forever.
On the other hand, gradual changes in customs, marketing, trademarks, the pattern of eating, and TV channels are improving towards standardization, which means we are going to an integrated, more harmonized world in which life much easier. Lifestyle similarity improves people's mutual understanding, which reduces confrontation between people. For instance, in the case of following the same rules in fashion, speaking, and reactions, people can understand each other more simple. As can be seen, being unity helps the community to avoid conflict by appreciating each other better than before.
The behavior of people around the world are converging towards each other. Despite this may be hard to understand and being adopted by conservatives, it helps make things easier and make the world be a more convenient place. As it was mentioned, the advantage of this trend is much more superior than disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...ed, the advantage of this trend is much more superior than disadvantages.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35761589404 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91010438178 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605960264901 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9879802541 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17208739899 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618386311149 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594284745803 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102688970377 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035127481376 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.