Email has had a huge impact on professional and social communication, but this impact has been negative as well as positive. Do the disadvantages of using email outweigh the advantages?
Technology is ever evolving. Nowadays, both professional and social communication have a different dimension with the introduction of email which brought a massive change. It is often argued that this is a positive growth, while other disagrees that it is a barrier for aged people to identify the spammy information over email. This essay agrees that email reduces the time while traditional letter used to take time to reach. This article will discuss both views.
It is certain, due to availability of internet, email has shortened time gap and reduced cost in the world of professional and public interaction. Rather than following traditional path and wasting money or time, we prefer email to communicate with whole world at any point of time. Therefore, it is agreed that email is a useful tool that makes the communication flowless. For example, if someone wants to get student visa for study in abroad, email will play the key role for smooth communication.
However, many disagrees as spammy email could lead people to risky situation and feel that traditional note is safe. Aged people who are not tech savvy they still find their comfort zone by choosing traditional way rather than ends up with such spammy emails. This essay disagrees human interaction is still possible without having email communication. For instance, we often notice that still now old general writes and send letters to connect with people.
In conclusion, there are various utilization of emails that makes our daily communication easy within short span of time. While in other hand other believes that traditional process would be better. But in my opinion, these disadvantages of using email will never outweigh the advantages and email could be considered as trustworthy tool.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-30 | SharmisthaNaskar | 78 | view |
2022-09-25 | Halt29 | 11 | view |
- Should long term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge experience 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 67
- Students perform better in school when they are rewarded rather than punished To what extent do you agree or disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 63
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ication easy within short span of time. While in other hand other believes that tradi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21328671329 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79939817694 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5807646687 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248869077807 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839267626906 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689391750995 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158584483149 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587259857255 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.