Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Employment of the right worker is a ubiquitous issue, which has resulted in the following two arguments. While some assert that qualification is pivotal for the most contemporary jobs, opponents criticise this advocating that soft skills have more positive outcomes for their companies. Thus, it is suggested that the human resources department should give preference to the hard skills and experience while recruiting a new employee. This standpoint seems to be valid for the following reinforced reasons.
The prime assertion to consider is that it is essential for an employer to be confident in the hard skills of the employee. Logically, the conventional approach of checking employees profile via their resumes or LinkedIn, qualifications issued by authorised bodies is vital. Were a company to hire a worker with a decent degree and sufficient experience, skills training might not be required to be carried out and might have a favourable outcome on budget. From this illustration, it is evident that background is pivotal for an employer because only a skilled person can play a vital role in organisation success.
Analogously, an educational background shows that a candidate also has soft skills. To accomplish a university degree, for example, a student should meet deadlines and complete tasks, which require to have outstanding personal qualities such as motivation, critical thinking, problem-solving. Similarly, an obtained degree enhanced by experience gives confidence to the employer that a candidate has exploited his knowledge and developed soft skills in the other positions. It is, thus, comprehendible that not only do candidate has a qualification and experience but also confirms his soft skills.
Objectors, however, assume that those with strong personal skills can communicate ideas clearly and listen well to others. They also exude a positive attitude at work, which is key to any healthy company culture. Albeit this, as mentioned above the candidates with qualification and experience also have a sufficient level of personal qualities.
Having justified the core reasons of choosing a qualified and experienced employee, it has to be reaffirmed that employers aim is to enhance their teams with qualified and experienced employees thereby making sure that they are able to effect positive outcomes for their companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | jellyb0711 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | anvarkuldash | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | anvarkuldash | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | Javeriya | 22 | view |
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...s. Thus, it is suggested that the human resources department should give preference to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'show'?
Suggestion: show
... Analogously, an educational background shows that a candidate also has soft skills. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54696132597 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12204562584 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4026689482 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166005809224 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547397211869 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356247501174 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909272647709 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257920414302 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.