The topic of traffic congestion is a very important concern for society at the moment. The way that provide free public transportation contributes reducing traffic congestion is one of alternatives.
We should start by taking a look at expense of transportations that the government must need to pay. It is good idea that government provide free public transportations for 24/7. Because it will be caused more commuters and citizens to use transportation instead of take their individual cars and congestion will be reduced. Nonetheless, it would be covered by taxes and if more residents take transportation, expense will increase by chance. Also, there is a chance to argue by tax payers.
Turning to the second point view, it is helpful to the environment. The environmental pollution is caused by various reasons. One of various reasons can be the cars. For instance, Seoul, Capital city of South Korea, provided free transportation for a day for better quality of air. As a result, 2 times citizens used transportations than usual and air pollution was improved. Therefore, the government provide complimentary service that public transportations encourage using public transportation to citizens and make more interest from commuters.
In conclusion, both arguments have strong arguments. The environment is not seen our eyes but definitely benefit to every single of us. Therefore, I totally agree with that government encourage using transportation by complimentary if government provide proper time schedule and can support enough financial.
- You took an elderly friend, who was not able to walk properly, to a museum and he faced many problems. Write a letter to the manager to let him know about the problems faced and what can be done to avoid those problems. 73
- Government is going to provide free public transportation facilities 24/7 to reduce the traffic congestion. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people spend a lot of money attending cultural or sports events. Is it a good or a bad thing? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 61
- Some people spend a lot of money attending cultural or sports events Is it a good or a bad thing Give your opinion and examples from your own experience 77
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this good or bad thing. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52719665272 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38692009717 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594142259414 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0070306321 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9375 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245473813608 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774411129224 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104755040918 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151710820226 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345885520871 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.