Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the government ought to take responsibility for the financial and management control of scientific research rather than private institutions. I am absolutely in support of this notion because of its astronomical cost and public safety.
To begin with, scientific research works are often expensive and may not yield profit. Usually, these research projects are a huge risk which not only cost much, but also may not bring desired outcome. This can be evidenced by the frequent research reports the Daily newspaper in Nigeria releases every third quarter of the year which show about 68% of unsuccessful research projects throughout the country. In this situation, while the government might not entirely run at loss, the private sector might encounter a credit crunch.
Furthermore, the safety of the public would be guaranteed. Clearly, the government's primary concern is the safety of the people whereas the sole aim of almost every private entity is profit. So, since the government have the interest of the nation at heart, any project that might cause a damage to the population would not be carried out regardless of the voluminous amount of fund invested. For instance, in 2011, the Federal Government of Nigeria disbanded several science institutions that posed some problems to the environment. If the government had not intervened, and the entire operation was controlled by the private sector, the public may not have been saved.
In conclusion, not only does the government have abundant resources to finance the astronomical cost of scientific research, they also prioritize the well-being of the people. For these reasons, I completely agree that it should be the responsibility of the government to finance and control the scientific research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-21 | ankita.hpgdc | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-21 | ankita.hpgdc | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-21 | ankita.hpgdc | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | ankita.hpgdc | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | adeagboridwan | 64 | view |
- A company has contacted the local council to build their company in the community. Write a letter to the council and in your letter,Write why it is a bad idea to allow them build their company in the community. Suggest another location for the company to 78
- Some businesses observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to lack interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues. What could be the reason for this? What solutions can help address this problem? 78
- Some people say schools should be responsible to teach young adults to look after their health, while others think this is not the responsibility of school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Today, most people get married and give birth in their thirties rather than when they are youngerIs it a positive or negative development?To what extent do you support this development? 78
- Shopping is now common in many countriesWhy is this the caseIs a positive of negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
... at heart, any project that might cause a damage to the population would not be carried ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 116, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nisations, and also the security of the general public is assured. For these reasons, I comple...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, third, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2688172043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86578808661 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7101927505 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305985950636 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106686145177 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112455507233 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202726107139 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076261566596 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.