Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many believe governments today should prioritise funding for medicine over environmental studies. In my opinion, learning more about the environment is one way to inform policy regarding climate change but more money should be directed towards medical research.
Those advocating for increased focus on the environment are eager to understand and counter the effects of climate change. There is arguably no greater threat facing the future of human civilisation than a degrading natural world. At the moment, billions are being poured into studies to understand how fast the polar ice caps are melting, what the impact will be, the damage to ecosystems, the interrelation between humans and these delicate ecosystems as well as the role of fossil fuels in aggravating climate change. There are wildly different theories about all these areas and some think the best utilisation of research grants is to give scientists free rein to study and collaborate in the hope of coming to a stronger consensus, which can then shape international accords and domestic policy decisions.
Despite the force of the above argument, I believe health is a more tangible and pressing concern. There is constant disagreement from climate scientists and it is unclear if increased funding would be a remedy or injury. Health research is unequivocally positive. Some of the many advances in health from the last several decades include increased understanding of mental illness, less invasive procedures for surgery, better vaccines, and countless new iterations of advanced medical equipment. These are all put into practice immediately and save or better lives in every country around the world. More money for research now would open up possibilities for new medical innovations that could involve experimentation with genetic modification and greater understanding of disease prevention.
In conclusion, making sense of climate change is important but nothing is more essential than one’s health. Governments ought to find ways to balance these competing interests but also be mindful of what most benefits their present citizenry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-27 | Saumilshah62802@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-02 | najam | 95 | view |
- Many people think that zoos are cruel Others think they are helpful in protecting rare animals Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- Write a letter to friend to inform them of a celebration you are having for a recent job promotion Include information about The promotion The celebration Their accomodation 91
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 67
- Some Companies Sponsor Sports As A Way To Advertise Themselves Some People Think It Is Good While Others Think There Are Disadvantages To This Discuss Both Of Sides And Give Your Opinion 73
- Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...lth research is unequivocally positive. Some of the many advances in health from the last s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52147239264 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93875276792 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8331399843 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196689933857 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633951531217 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067781924576 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125838719056 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785892496205 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.