the world witnessed a lot of diverse changes in the 21st century. One such important is humanity matters which has influenced many changes in people's mindsets. As a result, there are many people suppose that humans should stop exploiting animals for their own interest, yet, the role of animals in providing foods and contributing to many outstanding kinds of research which are believed to be irreplaceable by a few people.
There are many reasons to disagree with the term of exploiting animals. Firstly, It is brutally cruel and non-sense to hunt down animals for their body parts such as skins or horns for medical uses; meanwhile, there are no true evidences that these parts have any medical use. Secondly, similarly to our humans, animals also have emotion which has been proven through a lot of experiences. They are hurt when their skin is removed, fear when they are put in a cage, and sad when their children are captured. we should put ourselves in their shoes to understand that our small happiness was triggered by someone miserable. Finally, many animals such as pangolins and rhinoceros are now on the risk of extinction due to excessive exploitation. Losing these animals means violating the food chain and losing the natural balance.
On the flip side, those who oppose the above idea, usually emphasize the animal role in supplying food and researching. Most of our nowadays drugs were tested on monkeys or chimpanzees which share a similar DNA structure with humans. Without these creatures, our only alternative is to test on our humans which is even less humanity. Besides, animals are one of the main food supply in our daily meal. Without them, our humans could suffer from the food shortage because not all places on earth could grow plants.
To recapitulate, It is totally wrong to exploit animals for our purposes, yet, to some extent, our daily life still relies on animals. Personally, depending on purposes, we should consider whether this method of exploiting animals should be remained or considered to be legal or not. For motivations such as decoration or medicine without any proof, the behavior of exploiting should be prohibited.
- Learning english at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 82
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantageous and disadvantageous of solar energy 67
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Most people accept that we now live in globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the world witnessed a lot of diverse change...
^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...d sad when their children are captured. we should put ourselves in their shoes to ...
^^
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...to excessive exploitation. Losing these animals means violating the food chain and losi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66664351842 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0372849221 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305168152058 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849120780096 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616069276544 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183870916164 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508273920993 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.