Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poor nations. Rich countries should pay more attention.

Now countries in the world has divided in to two categories. Those are developing and industrialised countries. This difference manly depends on the amount of money they spent for health, education and trade.

In the beginning, I would like to illustrate about the poor countries. As an example Africa is in sub human condition due to lack of education, lack of natural resources, corruption, poverty, hunger and unemployment. Most of the people in this country suffer from hunger. According to reports, most of the rich countries destroy billion worth of unused extra food. They can provide these foods to poor people without destroying it. Another main problem in this country is the deadly disease, AIDS. Rich countries can provide good programs to control this situation. They are equipped with better medicines and suitable resources. They can also send doctors and nurses to these poor countries for help.

Secondly, most of the developing countries sell their natural resources to industrialised countries for cheap price. Then they buy industrialised products for a high price resulting huge financial gap. They borrow huge amount of money to fulfil this financial crisis. Due to this reason most of the developing countries have huge debt. As a result, G8 countries decided to forgive billions of dollars of debt of developing countries.

In conclusion, I would like to say, as human beings we should help each other. Therefore, to make a better world, industrialised countries should play a major role in guiding the developing countries to achieve their targets.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...rts, most of the rich countries destroy billion worth of unused extra food. They can pr...
^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'in conclusion', 'as a result']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249122807018 0.247107183377 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.133333333333 0.155533422707 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.133333333333 0.0946595960268 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0210526315789 0.0501214627716 42% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0421052631579 0.0437548338989 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115789473684 0.122226691241 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0385964912281 0.0403226058552 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8668788044 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0491228070175 0.0326793684256 150% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0912280701754 0.0861772015684 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0245614035088 0.021408717616 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1586.0 1933.35771543 82% => OK
No of words: 252.0 316.048096192 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29365079365 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20517956788 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.396825396825 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309523809524 0.28420135186 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210317460317 0.203846283523 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.174603174603 0.137316102897 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8668788044 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.037074148 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56746031746 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.6827523319 60.7387585426 93% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.2631578947 20.7743622355 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4883002057 49.517814964 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4736842105 127.492653851 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2631578947 20.7743622355 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.473684210526 0.814263465372 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 44.2155388471 49.1944974215 90% => OK
Elegance: 2.05357142857 1.69124875643 121% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313947036704 0.332605444948 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109049829967 0.102741220458 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.084063320384 0.0668466124924 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.47415990534 0.534860350844 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135735764932 0.148594505496 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11809879414 0.134430193775 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556174800454 0.0742795772207 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319997379392 0.324371583561 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0659881846337 0.0638462369009 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222681283408 0.228012699653 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080326867199 0.058150111329 138% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 2.5751503006 349% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 10.4468937876 172% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.