The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
Hitherto, the acceleration in manufacturing consumer merchandise leading to natural environment catastrophe transpires. Utilizing too much nature in order to get the materials for producing and manufacturing disposable items are two core roots of this practice, which can be radically tackled by using organic ingredients and setting stricter rules for these behaviors.
Admittedly, unrestrained environment exploitation, as well as single-use goods, are two principal grounds. First, woefully, a multitude of companies unlimitedly take advantage of nature to have more and more raw materials serving the manufacturing process and that causes natural damage. For example, people tend to deforest to make way for agriculture or woodening, which can easily exert myriad pollution such as soil, air pollution, etc..Second, legion firms these days are likely to produce more disposal items and most of them are non-biodegradable. Undeniably, these sorts of products like plastic bags attract a handful of customers due to their convenience. Therefore, a massive amount of single-use items disposing to the environment have been ceaselessly surging which is detrimental to nature.
Simultaneously, resorting to organic materials and punishing the aggressive behaviors of any producers towards the environment. To begin with, the authorities should encourage companies to use eco-friendly ingredients in lieu of relying too much on available natural sources. For instance, some companies intentionally produce reusable bags instead of the disposable ones. Furthermore, the government should enforce much stricter rules as a penalty for some producers deliberately harming the environment through the production stage.
In conclusion, there are two main reasons that trigger the damage to nature by the increase in the production of consumer goods. As a result, the authorities should join hands to make the production industry greener by encouraging the use of clean materials and setting rules to punish the firms damaging the environment
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-24 | kathiewithie | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | kathiewithie | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-02 | moledro | 73 | view |
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 67
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...llution such as soil, air pollution, etc..Second, legion firms these days are like...
^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Second
...ution such as soil, air pollution, etc..Second, legion firms these days are likely to ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86531986532 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2989348471 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2777562304 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169781618565 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609714060928 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054656062217 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116036560886 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629306063996 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.