Increasing the petrol price is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree. What other measures do you think might be effective?
Increase in traffic and pollution is a major concern for all countries. The easiest way to tackle these issues is by hiking fuel tariff and I totally agree with this notion. However, other measures like controlling the ease of acquiring the vehicles and good transport system can be very effective to solve these problems.
Firstly, the increase in number of cars in the city is directly related with the increase in pollution and traffic. One way to sort it is through increasing the gasoline prices. By doing so, people will prefer to use public transport resulting in less number of cars on the roads. For instance, in Pakistan, the government had increased the gasoline prices resulting in people sharing or using public transport and in one year they are able to substantially tackle these issues.
Secondly, the government should introduce such laws that will make it difficult for consumers to lease cars from banks. At the moment, anyone, with minor salary and less paper work, can easily buy it on installments from financial institutes. This trend can be easily tackle by increasing the cutoff limit for monthly income and also by increasing the amount of interest required to pay. By introducing this, the number of vehicles will reduce on the roads which will impact positively on the environment and traffic.
Thirdly, this issue can be tackle by encouraging the people by using public transport or share vehicles. For this, the concern authority has to advertise the benefits of using public transport and on motorways can introduce special lanes for buses and share cars. For example, in England, they have dedicated lanes for buses and share cars on highways. In this way, the amount of cars on the roads will reduce resulting in less traffic and positive impact on pollution.
In conclusion, apart from increasing fuel prices will help in tackle pollution and traffic problems but also the difficulty in purchasing cars and use of public transport or sharing cars will help in effectively tackling these issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-27 | insidematrix | 73 | view |
- With a growing world population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding such a large number of people Some people think that GM foods offer a viable solution to this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 54
- Many small, local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with large supermarkets in the area. How does this effect local communities? How could this situation be improved? 67
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- In some cultures people give more value to old people while in other cultures people give more value to young people. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es for buses and share cars on highways. In this way, the amount of cars on the r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08035714286 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63031767554 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0713878652 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134005291388 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547990985921 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411017283241 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905462863043 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498701641875 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.