Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, some governments increase price of petrol as the solution for growing traffic and pollution issues. On my point of view, I strongly disagree with that initiatve due to different reasons. Therefore, in this essay, I shall discuss on the other posssible solution that could be taken to mitigate pollutin and traffic congestion.
First and foremost, petrol is not only used in vehicles, but also in machinery used in industries. If, the petrol prices are increase it will effect tp the whole economic system, due to increase in transportation cost. If, governments need to minimize the traffic congestion they can invest lucrative amount on improving the quality of the public transportation. They can increase the number of trains and buses together with expanded and integrated road network inside the country.
In addition, governments can promote sustainable energy sources among their citizens such as solar power, wind power and sea wave power. For instance, they can provide loans on the purchase of solar panels or else the government can finace part of their initial cost of installation of solar panels. Similarly, governments can improve infrastructure facilities in suburbs to mitigate the number of vehicles coming in to the city limits, such as establishing government bodies in suburb areas. For example Sri Lanka, operates with two different cities such as commercial and administrative based on the nature of their operations. Some employers, even implemented flexible working hours and creat virtual offices to avoid traffic congestio together with the number of road accidents.
On the other hand, there are more other factors that would contribute on pollution other than fossil fuel fumes. The pesticides used in agricultural activities contribute on water, air and soil polluion. Utilization of CFC gas would also effect on air pollution other than fossil fuel combustion.
In conclusion, it is recommended not to increase the cost of petrol as a solution for pollution and traffic congestion. As an alternative solution, governments has to make a change in their attitudes on energy conservation and sustainable growth.
- Living in a country where you have to speak foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagre with the statement? 78
- The world’s governments and organizations are confronting multiple issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet. 55
- Governments promise continuous economic growths, but it’s actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications. 77
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 80
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your houseflat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your Letter•Explain the reasons for the noise•Apologise•Describe what action you will take 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... the petrol prices are increase it will effect tp the whole economic system, due to in...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...due to increase in transportation cost. If, governments need to minimize the traff...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ion. Utilization of CFC gas would also effect on air pollution other than fossil fuel...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44047619048 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98293877792 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0283716116 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135569461195 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486319317744 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562170479827 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876627826731 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049363999997 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.