Intelligent machines like robots will be widely implemented as a replacement for human beings. Broach its pros and cons.
With the advent of artificial intelligence, modern robots, termed steel employees, are deployed in various sectors like maritime researches, space exploration, and assembly lines. These robots take possession of numerous glaring advantages, but at the same time, they are not so flexible as expected.
Their pros are umpteenth. The application of autonomous robots in the automobile industry and the assembly lines of electronic devices helps reduce the amount of required human workforce. They not only ameliorate efficiency but also enhance precision and accuracy. As such, they are prevalent in developed countries. In Japan, one of ten thousand workers is a robot.
Robots are qualified for replacing human beings to perform tasks in polluted environments which are inaccessible to us. In recent years, mankind has aggrandized their comprehension of the universe whose perils are unpredictable. In contrast, robots are adept at engaging themselves in harsh circumstances including extreme temperatures in space. In hospitals, we can have recourse to robots to execute complex operations. Moreover, those machines are poised to uphold their functions incessantly while human doctors need breaks and sleep.
Nevertheless, their inconveniences are undeniable. First of all, all robots and smart devices are designed by human beings. Thus, they follow pre-installed procedures and instructions that make them prone to malfunctions. Besides, creativity is one of the human attributes which is not available in robots.
In short, I believe that robots are our assistants only. Despite their robustness in various fields, they are unable to replace human beings and do not play a decisive role in our lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-24 | manhhieu2001 | 61 | view |
- TPO 26 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- TPO 22 - Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons. 76
- TPO 21 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 36 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on univers 76
- TPO 31 - the fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones of Sinosauropteryx fossil are feathers. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ncluding extreme temperatures in space. In hospitals, we can have recourse to robo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in contrast, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65758754864 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09802896432 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657587548638 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9252774289 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7777777778 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2777777778 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206026060092 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533265588049 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059102520215 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101455498258 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504071163593 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.