The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Undoubtedly, internet has enhanced our communication perspective and helped us to stay connected with our near and dear ones at all times. No one can deny the fact that internet has diminished the flavor of social bonding. I accord with this notion and will share my views in further paragraphs.
Because of high speed and shim-less internet connectivity, people can search any information on internet using devices like smart phones, laptops etc. Moreover, due to the advancement in social media apps help us to stay connected with our families and friends from any part of the world. For instance, Facebooks, Twitter help us to share our moods, activities and location with our friend circles. Is this not a great thing that we can see our love ones via video calling from another corner of the world? We all should thank internet and technology for all this sorts of benefits.
Although internet gives us plethora of positives, the flavor of physical interaction and emotions among our families have reduced drastically. To illustrate, young kids are so indulge with mobile phones and social media that they hardly talk with their parents even in dinnertime. Who are to be blamed for this issue? Of cause, we, humans, are responsible for overuse of internet. This issue can be eliminated just by simply spreading awareness of negative impacts of long use of internet and positives of social interactions.
To sum up, though internet has helped us to stay connected with our good wishers from any place of the globe, the social bonding among us has reduced without any doubt due to overuse of it. By taking few initiatives such as spreading awareness will restore the balance of internet usage and social bonding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-03 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | ramneek | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | AhmedRaju | 73 | view |
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be mad 73
- “Since a competing lower‐priced newspaper, The Bugle, was started five years ago, The Mercury ’s circulation has declined by 10,000 readers. The best way to get more people to read The Mercury is to reduce its price below that of The Bugle, at least 63
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words 78
- Your child is going away on a school trip for three days to another country. The head teacher wants some parents to join the trip and you would like to go.Write a letter to the head teacher. In your letter:•Say why you would like to go•Suggest what yo 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: OF_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of course' (=naturally)?
Suggestion: Of course
...e. Who are to be blamed for this issue? Of cause, we, humans, are responsible for overus...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01045296167 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66132303821 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4988607431 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202837615705 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733234337308 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041123203983 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137924226254 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00927674712277 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.