Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that people can perceive international lives by using internet technology gadgets without setting their foot in those countries. Although the development of internet technology helps humans approaching information about other countries easily I would consider that traveling is the best way to gain knowledge about overseas life.
On the one hand, traveling is a practical way to clear our misconceptions about other nations. Today, various information is updated on the internet for different purposes. Some people who have not the chance to travel abroad feel confused between opposite information. Thus, people should experience the countries by their own five senses in order to have accurate viewpoints. For example, Saudi Arabia is portrayed as the most dangerous country for women by the New York Times magazine website in 2015 because they are only allowed to wear Burkha. This was proved untruths by President Barack Obama when he visited Saudi.
On the other hand, people can enjoy and experience new things by themselves. If people just apprehend information about abroad countries by watching images or videos on the screen, their lives become extremely boring and monotonous. By traveling, tourists can see the beautiful views and participant in interesting activities such as wearing customs, eating local food, or playing traditional games. For instance, every year, numerous foreigners visit Japan to see cherry blossoms, wearing kimono, and eat sushi.
In conclusion, it is convenient that people can understand information about other countries by using the internet and technological gadgets but I strongly believe that traveling is the perfect way in acquiring foreign cultures and lives. Experience is always the best method to learn new things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... setting their foot in those countries. Although the development of internet technology ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52919708029 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83389636692 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9112763496 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.214285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207863001739 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676436739694 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608047120532 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140573243868 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468532649235 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.