It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. What would be the best solution to keep them open, in your opinion?

Essay topics:

It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. What would be the best solution to keep them open, in your opinion?

Although museums are the most significant way of preserving historical monuments and traditional values, however making them available for the general public has become difficult due to the soaring maintenance cost. In my opinion, charging a nominal fee to visitors and subsidy from the government are major steps that can not be taken in order to ensure the availability of these exhibitions.

Undoubtedly, the administration has numerous responsibilities, and they have to allocate public funds to the essential social causes such as education, health and infrastructure. However, the necessity of upholding these museums can not be overlooked because these showcases are the ideal way to preserve many historical monuments, traditional events and arts but also disseminate awareness amongst a current generation. Thus, lawmakers must finance these exhibits to overhaul and further enhancements. For instance, Delhi National Museum contains events from the human development history such as footprints of various dinosaurs, hence it is an attraction for the school going students.

Further, putting minimal charges for the visit from the general audience would have a great influence on the development of these buildings as the accumulated money can be used for sustaining and improvement of these exhibits. For instance, the Delhi Railway museum of India is quite beautifully maintained through the public fund, and also visitors are being charged considerably higher fees. Not to mention, the infrastructure of several old museums has been deteriorating as a result of public interactions. Further, if there will be cost involved in exploring these exhibitions, there would be limited hordes of people in these buildings hence less damage to the infrastructure.

To conclude, granting financial support from the government and incorporating minimal visiting fees technique would be an ideal approach to uphold museums.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-16 jsingh76 73 view
2019-11-01 Moody123 89 view
2019-10-13 randhawa.harpreet91@gmail.com 70 view
2019-10-13 randhawa.harpreet91@gmail.com 78 view
Essays by user randhawa.harpr… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
..., however making them available for the general public has become difficult due to the soaring...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being charged considerably higher fees. Not to mention, the infrastructure of se...
^^
Line 9, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence less damage to the infrastructure. To conclude, granting financial support ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74305555556 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19269086833 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1531893778 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.363636364 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220742693318 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827217977244 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410935240096 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133261504465 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496389563698 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.