Human resource in any industry are the primary pillars of success. Organizations build up experienced resources after investing in their learning and development and workers too mould themselves according to industry requirements. However, in many cases management seems to replace experienced individuals with freshers. This phenomena could be due to several reasons. This essay will discuss whether such replacements are really a wise decision for any organization. In my opinion, every organization need bright and fresh ideas that can come up with out of box approached by new and young individuals but companies can not use them as replacement for experienced individuals as perfect organization need to have a perfect balance of both type of employees.
Experienced workers are crucial for business success because they provide much required support in daily execution and have deep understanding of business functions. For instance, in complex operation such as creating electronics chips knowledge and experience is quite necessary considering complexity of work involved. Similarly we can also look into example of physicians. It takes a lot of efforts to create experienced and knowledgeable doctors and if any medical hospital decides to replace same with college pass-outs clearly they can be severe consequences.
Based on above example it is quite clear that jobs that demands greater experienced individuals need to maintain experienced individuals along with a perfect blend of fresh candidate so that learning and growth continues.
To conclude, I totally agree that replacing experienced individuals with fresh minds is not wise decision for any business, instead businesses should focus on keeping a mixed blend which is also any organizations dream as it need to be innovative and at the same time need to focus on ongoing product for running product lines.
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to peopleDiscuss both advantages and disadvantages 73
- It is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. 84
- The international community should do more to tackle the threat of global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- With the recent improvement to internet people can leave views or opinions on certain goods or services they have purchased it is good n or bad thing discuss both 79
- More and more people are working at home rather than in the workplaces. Some people say this will bring benefits to the workers and their families, but others think it will bring stress to the home. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to mould'?
Suggestion: to mould
...ir learning and development and workers too mould themselves according to industry requir...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... experienced individuals with freshers. This phenomena could be due to several reaso...
^^^^
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...bright and fresh ideas that can come up with out of box approached by new and young indi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...onsidering complexity of work involved. Similarly we can also look into example of physic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, really, similarly, so, for instance, such as, in many cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56597222222 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11468784663 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.0231051695 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23988449722 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813555065682 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478482888261 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138100407173 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563861664523 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.