The maintenance of public libraries is a waste of money because technology is replacing its function. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Libraries have a vital role in the readers' life. Technology boon is weeding out the evident functions of the libraries and money not to be spent on the libraries which are the thoughts of several people. In my opinion, I entirely disagree with the statement. In the further essay, it will be delineated how the libraries are pivotal for the masses.
Predominantly, the significant reason behind maintaining the existence of the libraries is the diversity of the books. Most of the students are preferring to visit libraries because they can approach the same book with different authors. For instance, in Canada, teachers usually do provide a topic of the assignment to the tutee's which they have to prepare by themselves bu visiting the libraries to acquire a variety of books. This primary role of the library can never be played by the online book which is only approachable with an internet connection and the latest devices.
Secondly, libraries are a convenient and prime choice of the reader. The atmosphere of the library is so calm which can never create any disturbance. Anyone can reach there and access the library any time as pert the hours of the library. For example, the restriction of mobile phones and other electronic and noisy instruments are restricted to use which establish a study environment itself. Advanced E-books couldn't generate ambiance as the library.
To recapitulate, libraries are the cheapest and easiest way of using the plethora of books under one roof. The latest technology can provide some supplementary features but it can never remove its presence and the main roles. The authorities should maintain it by spending on the necessities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | gayathri subarshan | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | gayathri subarshan | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | rishabh98787 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | rishabh98787 | 73 | view |
- The maintenance of public libraries is a waste of money because technology is replacing its function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The maintenance of public libraries is a waste of money since the technology is replacing its function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readers'' or 'reader's'?
Suggestion: readers'; reader's
Libraries have a vital role in the readers life. Technology boon is weeding out th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
... of the books. Most of the students are prefer to visit libraries because they can app...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...dy environment itself. Advanced E-books couldnt generate ambiance as the library. To...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85232523297 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6466769091 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155914686522 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490646288303 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041118153373 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095445286083 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460387601247 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.