It’s recently argued that etablish modern building requires historical building to taken down for estate replaning purposes, due to the shortage of land for development. As a result, this situation leads to serveral drawbacks which will hamper the intended benefits. This essay will explain why.
On one hand, Demolition of old buildings can have a detrimental impact on the residential area nearby. The explanation for this is that the dust come from the building destruction is responsible for the increasing rate of air pollution. To be more particular, tiny molecules could easily go to the atmosphere, thus contaminate the air near the construction area. Consequently, the residents who live nearby will face lung-related diseases, such as breathing disorders, tuberculosis,..etc. Not only the dwellers, but the workers will possibly face the same pitfall. In addition, the deafening noise of the construction progress will be bothersome for the people who live there, as their daily life will be disturbed in a certain amount of time. As a result, the environment and the life quality will be gradually exacerbated.
On the other hand, Demolishing these structures can make way for more functional and efficient buildings that better meet the needs of modern users. The advocators of the replacement for modern structures mention that, with the establishment of new building, the life standard of the whole area will be enhanced, and the value of the land will be increased. For instance, the change of the purpose in agricultural lands to set up shopping malls in Vietnam has brought the convenience for the society. As a result, this will contribute to the country’s economy.
In a nutshell, despite the benefit of setting up new building, the demolition of historical building may cause severe disadvantages for our living condition and our environment
- In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result in order to modernize old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings Do advantages out weigh disadvantages 67
- In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result in order to modernize old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings Do advantages out weigh disadvantages 56
- In many cities there is a lack of space to develop and as a result in order to modernize old buildings are demolished and replaced with new buildings What are the disadvantages of knocking down old buildings Do advantages out weigh disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...uch as breathing disorders, tuberculosis,..etc. Not only the dwellers, but the wo...
^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ch as breathing disorders, tuberculosis,..etc. Not only the dwellers, but the wor...
^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...breathing disorders, tuberculosis,..etc. Not only the dwellers, but the workers w...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of modern users. The advocators of the replacement for modern structures mentio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35472972973 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14053116422 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1794792647 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156731905218 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514891404546 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561634695013 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107618698957 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239669566336 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.