Many countries are experiencing population growth and need more homes.
Should these new homes be built in existing cities or should new towns be built in the countryside?
There is an issue about where to erect new residential areas. Some social workers claim that it is better to build in current urban regions, while some developer suggest creating new towns in the rural places. This essay agrees with the idea of constructing houses in the city.
Let us start with reasons why some social workers state that it is better to locate new residential buildings in current municipals. The first reason is that it can save on town infrastructure. Architects can design apartment buildings without sewage, heating, and water systems, because they are available in the developed city, which allows to reduce the budget. Another reason is the approximate of universities. The best colleges commonly reside in cities, so school graduates, who live in homes near downtown, can much easier commute to their colleges than those from suburbs. Furthermore, cities secure high employment opportunities. Dwellers in newly constructed towns may find it arduous to get employment, since large companies prefer to concentrate branches near their headquarters, which are usually located in cities.
However, some politicians argue that developers should focus their effort on building new towns. They justify their point of view by the following arguments. Firstly, it may diminish high-populated areas. Many urban areas suffer from overpopulation, but, with the construction of new towns, city councils will be able to solve it. Secondly, there is a possibility for towns to grow into cities. Many towns have the opportunity to develop into municipals, because they have enough spaces for new blocks of flats as well as trading centers. Moreover, they can attract more investors by opening unoccupied markets. Businessmen tend to willingly open their departments in towns, if they have both a big population and scarcity of stores, so that they can find a niche.
In conclusion, although some developers advocate the idea of erecting apartment buildings in rural areas, I think it is reasonable to connect them with existing cities so that people can enjoy all benefits of urbanisation.
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 78
- Should private schools receive governmental funding? 78
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 89
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 56
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.What problems does it cause?What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...ble in the developed city, which allows to reduce the budget. Another reason is the appro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34939759036 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89547928007 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2798496833 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4736842105 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4736842105 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151268588437 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435811253152 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398592929858 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836618226408 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476680402766 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.