Many crimes are often related to the consumption of alcohol. Some people think that the best way to reduce the crime rate is to ban alcohol.
Do you think this is an effective measure against crime?
what other solutions can you suggest?
It is often believed that due to alcohol being the reason of many crimes, it should be banned. I believe the banning of alcoholic drinks can reduce crimes because many of the crime gets committed in the effect of these drinks, but to make it more effective government need to increase their security forces too.
It is the undeniable truth that alcohol is the root cause of many crimes. That is to say that when a person intakes an alcoholic beverage, it overrides the human brain, as a result many people tends to have impulsive behaviour. It further escalates into crimes like road accidents, street violence and spousal abuse, which can be all reduced by imposing ban on the liquor. To illustrate, in Gujrat, considered a dry state, a rule was implemented in 2005 to ban consumption and selling of any kind of liquor, as a result, reported crimes are reduced by 50%. Therefore, forbidding alcohol can certainly reduce the crime rate.
Other than that, the government can increase the number of police personals. Nevertheless to mention that if a criminal sees a police officer at every block surveilling streets then they have to be extremely careful before committing any crime. Not only it will prevent the crime but also there will be prompt action, if any such situation arises, to catch the culprits. For instance, a downtown area in Miami, famous for Haitian gangs and criminals, was cleaned up by increasing the ratio of police by 2 times in crime-prone areas. That is how, number of crimes is inversely proportional to the number of police surveilling the streets.
To conclude, indeed, banning alcohol is an effective way of countering crime because many crimes take place in the effect of its intoxication. Further, crime possibility could be reduced by hiring more policemen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | mohammed123 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | mohammed123 | 55 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | gaggug | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | VivianL | 58 | view |
| 2016-12-31 | Janani P | 79 | view |
- Spoken communication is always more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- More and more newspapers and news channels are using photographs to support their news articles and stories Some poeple think that photographs are not a reliable source of news while others consider photographs to be irrefutable Discuss both sides and giv 84
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be created with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree 78
- Doctors should be resoponsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health Do you agree with this 89
- Many crimes are often related to the consumption of alcohol Some people think that the best way to reduce the crime rate is to ban alcohol Do you think this is an effective measure against crime what other solutions can you suggest 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ncrease the number of police personals. Nevertheless to mention that if a criminal sees a po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for instance, kind of, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96357615894 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72037350351 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6893347087 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.071428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358928878907 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129370711899 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867831880585 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241096380307 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778829135488 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.