many people believe that its better to learn something in a group rather that individually. do you agree or disagree?
A large number of masses prioritize collaboration grasping rather that independently. I strongly favour this opinion and will delve into benefits of such king of learning in forward paragraphs.
Same peer groups generally find it interesting to work on things together which,consequently, gives a rapid pace of accommodating different tactics to learn a subject, additionally, it also breaks monotony as individual study can result in giving up on difficult contents of subjects, hence, building a habit of procrastination. on top of it,various difficulties can be overcome on the spot by explaining as well as giving thorough solutions due to active participation of every person in a group.
Furthermore, another fruitful advantage of batch study is that it develops one's intellectual skills, as a result, enhancing confidence in communicating with others. As with active participation, each person brain storms on contents of the subject which advances their thought process for troubleshooting of any obstacle. hence, the reason behind conducting a class filled with 10-20 number of students is preferred over individual tutions.
to recapitulate, group learning ha myriad of benefits and it should be preferred for mastering any skill in lieu of individual learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | poojary.swetha92@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | bishu | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of masses prioritize collaboration graspin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , consequently
...resting to work on things together which,consequently, gives a rapid pace of accommodating di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...e, building a habit of procrastination. on top of it,various difficulties can be o...
^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , various
...a habit of procrastination. on top of it,various difficulties can be overcome on the spo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...ss for troubleshooting of any obstacle. hence, the reason behind conducting a class f...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...s preferred over individual tutions. to recapitulate, group learning ha myriad ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 193.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63730569948 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48435483414 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.689119170984 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8729874487 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844790713479 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342425465837 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283164686786 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519614558375 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302661906665 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.