With advent of social platforms, for instance Facebook, people started spending excessive time using them until many people realised its negative effect on individual people as well as on local societies. Although social media platforms owners claimed these platforms were to connect people globally, but in my opinion, I completely agree that these platforms have had damaging effect on individual people as well as on societies.
Excessive use of social media platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter, have adverse effect on people, not only mentally but also physically. Admittedly, people who spend a lot of time on such platforms are falling into depression, anxiety and obsession. Moreover, these kinds of platforms kill most of people’s time, hence people’s involvement in physical activities has reduced significantly, which is hurting their health status. Steps need to be taken to pull people back to pay grounds and other physical activities, so that they can enjoy a healthier life.
Another point to consider is that local societies are also not safe from negative impact these platforms are causing. Rather than people taking part in their local community, they are instead choosing to take more interest in people online. Consequently, people within local communities are not making supportive relationships. Furthermore, society as a whole is becoming increasingly disjointed and ore fragile as people spend more time with people online.
To conclude, where social media platforms were supposed to play positive role in building societies, they are actually creating numerous social problems. Local communities need do more to try to involve people in social activities in order to promote the future of community life.
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to think about when buying a product (such as a cell phone) or service (e.g. medical treatment). Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that formal education should start for children as early as possible While others think that it should not start until 7 years of age discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Many people think advertisements are not useful for customers while others think that they are important for customers. Give your opinion. 84
- A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work. you have had a similar problem in the past.write a reply to your friend . In your letter:1. tell your friend you understand the problem.2. explain what happened to you in the past.3. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...platforms owners claimed these platforms were to connect people globally, but in ...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ssion, anxiety and obsession. Moreover, these kind of platforms kill most of people's...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al communities are not making supportive relationships. Furthermore, society as a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54104477612 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86056321342 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59328358209 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2048572671 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214967646099 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797417285227 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473015579621 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132660381631 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524054495873 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.