Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Unfortunately, today, numerous wild animals are becoming extinction. Although most individuals opine that all measures must be taken to support all of them, a few people think that a small fraction of them should be protected. Both groups have some rational reasons, as we shall see.
To support the latter view, two main reasons have been mentioned. Firstly, a fraction of wild animals is extremely dangerous for human. To exemplify, in most occasions, especially in residential areas near to the jungles, lions, tigers, leopards or even crocodiles attack villagers and severely injury them or even worse, kill them. Furthermore, wild animals can make devastating financial damages for farmers. To explain more, some animals such as wolfs or fogs go to the farmland to attack poultry or sheep herds and as a result, farmers encounter some financial problems.
Nevertheless, most people emphasize that all species should be maintained because of two significant reasons. Firstly, wildest species can be effective in controlling animal populations. To illustrate this vividly, some predators hunt obnoxious animals like rabbits and rats, which usually deteriorate agricultural products. Secondly, all animals who live in the jungles and natural places can keep their habitat lively and persistence. To cite this clearly, some animals like bears are able to protect vegetation coverage in their habitat as they discard the bones and skins of their food, on the ground. According to some evidence, this bears’ habit provide essential micronutrients for forest’ soil.
To conclude, although some wild animals might have vulnerable for human, it should not be overlooked that most of them can be beneficial to keep their habitat alive and lush. In addition, they can decline the excessive number of small animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-03 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-16 | Qamarbek | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | Anupama Barooah | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | Jaskaran Kaur | 64 | view |
- Some people think that planting trees in open spaces in cities and town is more important than building houses To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back Things to include You need to be concise but explain what happened No one respond 70
- Some people think that cities are the best places to live Others prefer to live in a rural area Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience 56
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back Things to include You need to be concise but explain what happened No one respond 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the wildest'.
Suggestion: , the wildest
...ause of two significant reasons. Firstly, wildest species can be effective in controlling...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the excessive number of small animals.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45390070922 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82379963419 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613475177305 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4338461392 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224945435318 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674106036446 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403319014676 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139734520418 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490031839891 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.