Of late, the necessity of building new homes has been increased over the world. However, there is not much place available in city area to concrete new buildings or houses, so most of the builders and governments chose the countryside to overcome the issue. As a result of this decision, few protests have been going on over the world and their main aim is to protect the countryside by opposing any concentrations. In this essay I will discuss more opinion on the same.
There could be a plenty of drawbacks, if we start using the countryside or village lands for any developments. Firstly, this action could destroy the agriculture land which are available in the villages. Thus, the food inflation could touch to its maximum limits and this will increase the poverty levels in any country. Second, by building the house in countryside we might lose the scenic or breathtaking views and it can be direct effect on the money which is coming from tourism industry. This could be a fortune and no county would like to cut such a massive amount from their budget. Third, the amount of fresh air would drastically comedown if we cut down the trees in the countryside to build new house. In longer run, this will affect the life span of the people.
On the other hand, few might argue that home is the basic need for any living person. If there is no space available in the city, then they should start working on the countryside. I do agree to the fact that a house is the basic need of above all, however, we can use new technology methods and we can build few skyscrapers in the central areas to provide more houses to the people. Also, we should come up with other alternatives to overcome the house for all issue.
In my opinion, there could be one or two benefits in building more houses in the countryside. However, the drawback overweighs the advantages. To conclude, I strongly condemn any such activities.
- Nowadays people are affected by social media and the Internet. Is it a good or a bad trend, in your opinion? Explain it by giving your own examples. 61
- Last Wednesday you flew from London to Vancouver When you arrived home you discovered that you had left your hand luggage on the plane Write a letter to the airline In your letter you should explain Where and when you lost your bag What your bag looks lik 91
- You have just returned from holiday and were not satisfied with your trip. Write to the travel agency. In your letterSay where / when you went on holidayExplain why you are not satisfied with your holidayTell them what you would like them to do 87
- You recently organized an all-day meeting for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.-Say what the part 78
- You have just returned from holiday and were not satisfied with your trip. Write to the travel agency. In your letterSay where / when you went on holidayExplain why you are not satisfied with your holidayTell them what you would like them to do 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little might'.
Suggestion: little might
...an of the people. On the other hand, few might argue that home is the basic need for a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, as to, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67256637168 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61542314245 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533923303835 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9513268947 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219432934837 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670483357146 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618584830104 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138455362797 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498843301509 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.