In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
With the growing population, it is obvious that more homes are required for accomodation. New open spaces for homes are available on countryside. It is being argued by some people that coutryside protection is more important than buliding new homes. In my views, protecting countryside is equally important as building ew homes.
It is a basic human need to have shelter for them to stay and live their life in peaceful environment. However, it is equally important for us to protect the countryside alonngwith making new homes. Requirement of new homes is directly propotional to the population and as the population is increasing so there is an increase in the demand of new homes. As open spaces are only available at countryside, growing need of new homes is a continous threat to the existance of countryside which is an important part of ecosystem. But both needs can be satisfied using technologies and adopting modern living style.
If it is the only option left for accomodating people is to build new homes in countryside, countryside can be protected by encouraging people or enforcing regulations to build homes with minimum possible covered area and retain the country side environment as a whole. This will also help people of that society to live in a nature friendly environment. Another way is to build multiple story buildings to accomodate more people in lesser area. For example, dubai has a lot of high rise buliding that are accomodating huge population and providing them better living standards as well. For example, country side has been protected successfully in my native city Islamabad by providing extended land to people who want to build homes in countryside and then regulating them to contain the country side farms and with limitation of maximum covered area.
Concluding the above discussion, I would say that protecting the countryside is equally important as compared with building new accomadations. So accomodation options should be increased in downtown areas with high rise building. If required in countryside, it must be according to some regulations that will protect the status of countryside and nature. By doing this, we can accomodate people'ss need for new homes and protect nature as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | hitakshi patel | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | ielts_tony | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | shadow1222 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Niharika rani | 78 | view |
- In many places new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there What is your opinion about this Give reasons for you 67
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful Others disagree Discuss both these views 67
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests and whether they are married or single Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful Others disagree Discuss both these views 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, for example, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16438356164 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02238350092 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479452054795 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4309236578 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.722222222 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472716397368 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161742800778 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092177119849 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325692101493 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549039247275 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.