Since from the modern digitalisation era, the form of communication has been changed drastically. it is actually started with simple letters and now social media and mobile phones are dominating this field of technology. Some says that this modern form of technologies are negatively effecting people's life. I completely agree with this statement.
According to gregorian theorem, man is a social animal. People need to socialise in order to develop their inter personal skills, but this modern ways of socialising is entirely redefining the concept of social life. These technologies does not give any importance to face to face communication, these new forms of communication media are actually bringing people close together in digital world only not in a real world. Because of this people lack that bond or feeling when they talk to each other over the mail or through any messaging platforms.
Moreover, recent studies pointed out that people are getting addicted these kind of technologies and they don't even want to meet their friends or relatives when they have a chance. They use that time also to send messages to people who are acutally away from them. Furthermore, these digital from of communications are actually lacking a huge important factor 'privacy'. There is always a chance of security breach in these modes of socialising, which may some times leads to leakage of personal messages to totally unwanted persons.
In conclusion, no matter how far the technology is developed, we can not recreate the feeling of talking to each by physically meeting them. It is a human basic human psychology, it is almost impossible to substitute it.
- Some people feel that the responsibility for providing education should be borne only by the government and that private education should be banned Discuss both views and give your opinion 91
- Politicians are more responsible for protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart illustrates housing preferences among people who lived in the British cities of London, Oxford and Cambridge in the year 2005. 73
- Nowadays in some countries the numbers of children aged 15 and younger are increasing What are the current and future effects of ever increasing population 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...unication has been changed drastically. it is actually started with simple letters...
^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'do'.
Suggestion: do
...cept of social life. These technologies does not give any importance to face to face...
^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...chnologies does not give any importance to face to face communication, these new forms of commu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ld only not in a real world. Because of this people lack that bond or feeling when t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ed out that people are getting addicted these kind of technologies and they dont even want...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ted these kind of technologies and they dont even want to meet their friends or rela...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...at time also to send messages to people who are acutally away from them. Furthermore, t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18215613383 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88046282725 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620817843866 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4073028208 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5714285714 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214764874523 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711062975612 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544416591419 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116559237705 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745728849921 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.