More and more businesses as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face-to-face.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating.
Nowadays, the majority number of commercial agents and inhabitants are considering to intercourse either formally or informally operating various technological tools instead of one-to-one conversation. Development of telecommunication technology has enhanced living standards of human beings’ but there are few drawbacks came into existence as well.
Firstly, to begin with, evolution of technology has improved diverse aspects of human life. In addition, there are vast numbers of merits been observed one foremost benefit of communicating through modern technology WhatsApp, Facebook, twitter and various other socializing applications have narrowed the conversation gap. For instance, it is apparent that millions of folks connect via the internet to chitchat with their love ones around the globe. Moreover, this mode of communication has widely incorporated by multiple business entities as well which sustain them to make better management decisions and reduce cost for number of official activities for example recruiting staff internationally have become very smooth as most official distant interviews are conducted via Skype.
Nevertheless, despite gigantic advantages of conversing through technological tools various demerits has also been witness. One substantial effect of utilizing telecommunication channels have result in fading the significance of tangible conversation between individuals. However, the repercussion of the survey has revealed that ninety per cent of community especially teenagers have contradictory effects as they have isolated themselves from the physical socializing with family and friends.
To recapitulate, both ways of communication are imperative for human beings. In my opinion, it is about opting balanced approach and we ought to be using telecommunication tools as well as one-to-one modes for our conversation. We have to analyse our requirements of conversation if it is officially or informally and persuade accordingly.
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 84
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment, but population and education as well.What problems will your country face in the next ten years?How can these problems be overcome? 73
- Write a letter to your English-speaking friend. In your letter:•Explain why you have gone to live in the new city•Describe the place where you are living•Invite your friend to come and see you 87
- Some people say that having a lot of TV channels is good, while others argue that it reduces the quality of programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.12903225806 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46113352523 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663082437276 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.04643164 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9166666667 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160940938007 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564224284239 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035721987669 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955161677663 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271011197356 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 14.29 50.2224549098 28% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.57 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.