with an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree?
The notion that growing populace interacting through the mass media technology hence, one-to-one mode of conversation is considered as old fashion. To some extent I agree with the above stated statement. This essay considers the reasons of such practice.
Firstly, to begin with, communication channel survey in 2013 revealed the abundant group of residents are operating the computer and smart technology for their intercourse with friends and peers. In addition, the enormous number of inhabitants has chosen their comfort zones and prefer utilizing their mobile phones and laptops for connecting with individuals around the globe. For instance, various contradictory effects were observed one foremost is too get-off from socializing.
Secondly, modus vivendi of citizens and availability of innovating technological tools portrayed an integral role in manifesting options for conversation.Nevertheless, it may vary from one person to others. Nevertheless, the ancient group of inhabitants love to have a tangible meet up with their friends and family members and enjoy quality time. For instance, it is apparent that hitherto years were independent and had limited resources of today's modern technological tools and consequently, folks were more involved in physical chitchat.
On contrary, if we analyze the developments of this century where access of clever gadgets are available on a vast scale, which persuaded people to isolate themselves from networking. Communities are influenced and are obsessed with their smart mobile phones and perhaps, has exhibit the feelings that live meet up is outdated.
To conclude, both ways of communication are imperative for human beings, however; it is regarding perception of residents and their comfort zones which had influenced them to choose the convenient ways of conversing and mingling with societies around the globe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-16 | Mohamedyousef777 | 95 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | Mohamedyousef777 | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 41 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 11 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | shivangi patel | 11 | view |
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 78
- Write a letter to your English-speaking friend. In your letter:•Explain why you have gone to live in the new city•Describe the place where you are living•Invite your friend to come and see you 87
- These days science developments have encouraged people to stay upto 100 and 200 years. Some people beleive its a good thing while others say it will create troubles discuss both veiw and give your opinion 56
- many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and are using the internet to socialize with others. This has can lead to a number of dangerous situations which can be threatening for children.What problems do children face when going online 95
- Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...in manifesting options for conversation.Nevertheless, it may vary from one person to others....
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 277, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'exhibited'.
Suggestion: exhibited
...ir smart mobile phones and perhaps, has exhibit the feelings that live meet up is outda...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75357142857 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.214601175 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632142857143 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5134788654 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.078641889417 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312124132836 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402457488286 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434531475838 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018970375109 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.