More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work.
What will be consequences for this? What solutions can you offer?
Nowadays, there is an uplifting trend among rural population move to cities for seeking of employment. Meanwhile, side effects of this trend may be drastic. One of the best ways to tackle the issue is providing subsidies and investments for agriculture by government.
The movement of rural population to cities arouse plenty of different issues such as increased level of crime and unemployment in urban areas. As well as this, population growth leads to increasing of number of vehicles on the roads and as a result, the raised number of the exhaust fumes boost the air pollution. In addition, overcrowd puts significant pressure on whole infrastructure of a city including house demand, water and electricity supply, which is directly connected with the level of citizens’ life. For instance, Los Angeles is facing a typhus epidemic issue because plenty of people have arrived to the city and number of homeless is exceeding a reasonable number.
The key to solving this problem is reducing a flow of people relocating to urban areas. In order to implement it governments should provide subsidies for agriculture as well as invest money in improvement of rural infrastructure. For instance, the authorities should invest money in building rural schools, roads, electric and gas lines. Thus, farmers having financial support will be able to concentrate on local food production, which in the long term will bring economic growth to the area. Consequently, country habitants will be encouraged to live and work in a country.
In conclusion, there are number of negative effects of growing number of urban residents due to the influx of people from the villages. However, it could be solved by investing money in agriculture and rural infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Mariamirabella | 61 | view |
- People doing dangerous sports like bungee jumping and scuba diving should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers should not risk their live people.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Human activity has damaged the environment all around the world Some people think that humans cannot stop damaging the planet where as other believe that we can alter our behaviour and prevent future damage Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- Your colleague loaned you a book to use in a presentation at work Write to your friend to say What the presentation was about Why it was important How the book helped you 56
- Letter of complaint You recently stayed at a hotel for a conference with your company and there were several problems with your room Write to the hotel management to complain Include Where you stayed What the problems were How they can fix your complaints 67
- Some people think that a person can never understand the culture of a country unless they speak the language Do you agree with opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eless is exceeding a reasonable number. The key to solving this problem is reduc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...couraged to live and work in a country. In conclusion, there are number of negat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30141843972 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03046292635 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0110316421 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204015524711 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702273969636 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355557395024 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124683482283 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514493885656 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.