More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work What will be the consequences of this What solutions can you offer

Traveling to first world countries have always been the dream of many because it is believed that a better life awaits them across. There are many people who are relocating from agricultural backgrounds to cities. In this essay I will discuss how relocation to cities makes farming for personal use impossible, and the reduction in possibilities of getting attacked by reptiles in urban areas.

Farming for private use would not take place in countries like America given that it is illegal to do so. The laws of the state prevents such acts once you reside in the area. To illustrate, you cannot grow pepper at your backyard for personal use when it is highly prohibited in Chicago. Similarly, other fruits are not available on trees unless you go to the stores to get them. Clearly, having a personal farm while in developed areas would not happen; these are some things that come with development.

The possibilities of getting bitten by reptiles in urban areas are less given that agricultural practices are properly attended to. There are public farms available, yet issues like attacks from reptiles are not recorded. In the city, for Instance, development of infrastructures reduces availability of farm animals such as snakes. Additionally, the nature of jobs in developed countries exposes you to daily interactions rather than engagements that can expose you to harm from wild lizards. So, it is clear above that it is almost impossible to get attacked by reptiles in cities due to their good agricultural practice.

I have discussed how relocation to cities makes farming for personal use impossible, and the reduction in possibilities of getting attacked by reptiles in urban areas. After the discussions had earlier, I will suggest that the developed countries should create more agricultural farms.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, while, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17627118644 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89510180799 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4951726599 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165653795712 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586151911232 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532941197807 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110459033192 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381528783515 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.