More and more people today are drinking sugar-based drinks.
What are the reasons for this? What are the solutions?
It is true that, beverages that contain sugar are becoming excessively popular. There appear to be three main causes of this, and several possible solutions, as we will explain here.
To begin with, the reasons behind the high rate of sugar-based drinks consumption are the modern lifestyle of individuals which encourage them to consume unhealthy, high-calorie food and drinks in order to maintain the energy balance of the body. Nowadays in a competitive market, manufacturers promote their products without appropriate data about the content of the product on the food labels. To put it simply, food companies hide the sugar content of products by listing the names of sweeteners like glucose, fructose, sucrose, grape concentrate instead of sugar, as a result, people unknowingly consume sugar. Moreover, celebrities promote a sugar-based drinks, hence fans purchase sugar added soft drinks to emulate their idols. For instance, as a result of Messi`s promotion of Pepsi, Pepsi`s sales increased significantly.
Regarding potential solutions, firstly individuals themselves should develop a habit to read all the contents of the soft drinks, which they are going to consume. Despite the fact that many drinks contain sugar, people should to choose alternatives like green tea and mineral water which is good for their health. Secondly, parents should teach their children not to imitate everything which is broadcasted on television and on the internet. In addition to it, probably the main remedy would be the rise of people`s awareness about food. Also, government should support scientists who want to implement healthy diet into society. For example, journal Science published an article about the scientist whose research was invested by authorities. Due to the government`s funding, the research that was conducted in order to introduce healthy diet to the Chinese population completed successfully.
In conclusion, the ubiquity of sugary drinks due to the celebrities and companies which are eager to exploit numerous methods to fatten their bottom line. However, this issue can be curbed through thoughtful regulation of individuals and government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | samdilnura | 89 | view |
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work Other employers see no benefit in doing so Consider the arguments from both aspects of
- solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world why this what are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 89
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- ndividuals and countries cannot help everyone who needs help in the world so they should only be concerned about their own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Over sugar consumption is unhealthy Some people think that governments should take responsibility to control it Others think that individuals should take responsibility of sugar intake Discuss both the views and give your opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60422960725 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9887141183 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622356495468 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5994324515 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181846337397 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516486671967 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562176036444 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956084287741 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525999867563 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.