More developing countries are given aid from international organizations to help them in their development plans. Some people argue that financial aid is important but others suggest that practical aid and advice are more important.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is an issue about the form of support to growing nations. Some financial analysts think that this support should be monetary, while some economists think that guidance on development is enough. This essay agrees with the idea of recommendations.
Let us start with reasons why some financial analysts state that growing economies should receive help in monetary form. The first reason is that countries in need know better of their problems. Nations, which want to develop, are aware of hindrances on the way to achieve theirs targets, so they mainly need money provided by donators. Another reason is that the success of projects usually depends on funding. Any project is likely to come accomplished, when it has sufficient finances. Therefore, developing nations usually need material support to complete their goals. Furthermore, the abundance of money often secures confidence. Nations, which have unlimited sources of money, tend to grow faster and more solid, because they have
However, some economists argue that developed nations should supply growing nations with recommendations for the following reasons. Firstly, corruption may absorb most of the financial assistance. Many developing nations remain in the immature state for long period, because corrupted politicians may steal the donated money, so wealthy countries should guide them on how to succeed in development. Secondly, recommendations will help inexperienced economies avoid unnecessary expenditure. These economies usually make a avoidable mistakes, so prosper countries should participate in their growth in order to prevent from these errors. Moreover, advanced nations can educate officials with the best methods of management. Developed countries may invite managers from growing countries to study at highly recognized universities, so that they can apply the obtained knowledge in favor of their homeland.
In conclusion, although some analysts suggest to help nations in their evolution with funding, I think that mature economies should provide them with advice.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-05-27 | oyondev007 | 92 | view |
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers 56
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 73
- As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 73
- Can brain damage from drugs be reversed? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...faster and more solid, because they have However, some economists argue that deve...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...enditure. These economies usually make a avoidable mistakes, so prosper countrie...
^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'mistake'?
Suggestion: mistake
...hese economies usually make a avoidable mistakes, so prosper countries should participat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71986970684 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87339623155 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.824190119 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172147838357 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489427677737 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376138308555 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104660236358 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016668222164 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.6 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.