Nowadays courses and general study online are getting very popular However some people still prefer attending classes in person Discuss both views and give your own opinion

There has been a revolution going around the approach of study. It has introduced a new debate in society, whether the online study is a more sophisticated way of learning than the traditional face-to-face classes. This essay examines both the options and gives the reasons why the online study should be a preferred mode of tuition.
Nowadays, the online study method has become more popular as it brings several benefits. The first of them relates to the saving of time and elimination of the geographical boundaries. For example, a student living in a remote location getting an online course can study from his site, which will not only save time but also travelling expenses. Besides this, with this way of study, the student can take a class at a convenient time, and they can record the lessons and watch them again, which enables them to revise their study.
The online study brings some pros, but we cannot ignore the traditional in-person study approach and the positives of it. A first benefit relates to the betterment of the communication in this way of learning; for example, a scholar can ask any doubts and explain it better if the teacher is in front physically. It will benefit not only the student but also the teacher. To extend it further, the lecturer can read the expressions of pupils and even examine them in a much effective manner.
After examining both the ways of swotting, the latest approach of online learning overweights the old-fashioned option of taking courses. This approach is becoming more efficient day-by-day with the improvements in the technologies, which introduces numerous studies on the internet.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...holar can ask any doubts and explain it better if the teacher is in front physically. ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01824817518 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77565482067 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558394160584 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0022188734 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144984823579 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052063681411 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574511391299 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875820504516 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264911549102 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.