Nowadays larger distances are traveled by people to work and study on a daily basis. Some consider it to be a negative development, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While traveling for a long distance on a daily basis has become a norm in modern life, there is a controversial debate on whether or not it is a positive development. This essay follows the opinion that merit of this trend for society outweigh its drawback and the reasoning behind both perspectives will be discussed in this essay.
Long-distance traveling would contribute to the success of both individuals and the economy. Firstly, long-distance commuters have more options to study or work. The geographical location was a major factor in the decision-making process of students or employees before, since traveling for a long distance was impossible in the past. However, these days, people are not forced to relocate to a new place, and instead, they could keep their location while commuting every day with high-speed public transportations or personal vehicles. Secondly, private and public sectors could also get benefit from this development due to the availability of workforces everywhere. With more people ready to travel, companies are more flexible in order to fill their vacancies, and companies do not have to raise salaries to attract limited workforces in a place
However, critics mentioned several adverse consequences of this development. These travels are time-consuming, so workers or students have less time for their private lives. Therefore, this would affect people's work-life balance, leading to stress-related illnesses, such as depression or obesity, and lower life quality in the long-term. Besides that, it is also an undeniable fact that these volumes of traffic have negative effects on the environment. With low-quality fuels and non-standard vehicles, the amount of daily commute would contribute heavily to global warming due to the emission of hazardous gas.
In conclusion, while there are downsides with the new trends that people commute for a long distance every day, this essay believes that there more advantages for both individuals and society by continuing this plan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-05 | zyan jabbar | 87 | view |
- Some people think that old people need to live in special communities but others believe they should live with their family and adult children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should spend most of their time on studying and playing, and they shouldn’t be required to help family with household chores, such as cleaning and cooking. 85
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
- Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services Discuss both 87
- Some think that teenagers should follow older people s rules Others think that it is natural for them to challenge what older people say Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ife, there is a controversial debate on whether or not it is a positive development. This essa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctives will be discussed in this essay. Long-distance traveling would contribute...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...attract limited workforces in a place However, critics mentioned several adver...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ue to the emission of hazardous gas. In conclusion, while there are downsides...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48089171975 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05166673888 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.102766 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.384615385 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168716457349 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631805686156 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418213425673 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107224308557 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335108569642 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.