Nowadays, a lot of children are using mobile phones. Many say it is good. Some say it is bad. What is your opinion?
Cellphones are becoming increasingly popular among youngsters every day. Whether it is a positive trend or a negative one has long been controversial. While some people believe that it is beneficial to a child to possess a mobile phone, it is argued by others that it brings more negative impact than positive. This essay will analyze both sides of argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
On the one hand, those who argue in favor of giving young people cellphones claim that it is crucial for several reasons. First, a mobile phone is the quickest mean of communication. For instance, if a child encounters a difficulty or a problem, he can easily reach his parents by using his cellphone. Second, recently mobile phones have been developed. In other words, now a mobile phone is not only used for making calls , but also it consists of games, books, as well as some applications that are educative for children, therefore, they are also considered entertaining devices. That makes it clear why giving children mobile phones has garnered support.
On the other hand, despite these reasons, opponents of the usage of mobile phones by children have stronger argument. Primarily, mobile phones may entice children to spend more time in playing than in studying due to the games on it. Another reason is that the unsupervised access to the internet on mobile phones has serious drawbacks. Moreover, the mobile phones are extremely tempting, that children are more likely to spend more time playing games and logging on to the internet than engaging in real activities. Concomitantly, it affects their social and physical development. Because of these reasons, it is easy to see why children should not use mobile phones especially in young age.
To conclude, both sides of the argument have strong support, however, after analyzing both camps it is obvious that using mobile phones by youngsters cannot be supported. I believe that its negative aspects will forever exceed the positive ones because it wastes time and hinders the child's social and mental development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-30 | farrukhali14 | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | Sana001 | 11 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | eshneha kc | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | abhikaus92 | 67 | view |
| 2018-02-22 | noorali.bhayani@srb.gos.pk | 56 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 77
- It has been noticed that recent young people are spending their leisure time in shopping centers but not engaging their selves in other activities such as sport or music.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 77
- Nowadays, many children are using cellphones and mobile phones. Many say it is good. Some say it is bad. What is your opinion? 56
- It has been noticed that recent young people are spending their leisure time in shopping centers but not engaging their selves in other activities such as sport or music.Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- "The only thing that interferes my learning is my education" — Albert Einstein. Discuss this statement and give your opinion. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... phone is not only used for making calls , but also it consists of games, books, a...
^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e childs social and mental development.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12941176471 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72770469256 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.423739404 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127898849716 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437757149901 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359179668658 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755095175969 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361658090032 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.