Nowadays many countries are facing the problem of heavy traffic and congestion. Describe the situation in your home country and suggest some solutions.
It is certainly true, that the problems related to organization of city transport system have increased over the past few decades. There are a number of considerable dangers with regard to this matter, and various measures can be taken to improve the situation. This essay will discuss negative aspects of traffic-related issues in Russia and will suggest several solutions to address these ever-growing problems.
There are several apparent complications resulting from the heavy traffic in Russian cities with population over 1 million people. The most critical concern is constant growth of the carbon dioxide emission. As a result, city-dwellers are suffered of many throat and lung diseases. Another matter is that people in these cities are faced to the problem of reaching the needed destinations in time. For instance, the average time to get to the center of Moscow from suburban areas is more than an hour.
However, above-mentioned problems can be solved. The best way to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide would be to raise the taxes on car usage. Consequently, car owners would use public transport which is more nature-friendly, especially if it is electrical bus. Likewise, the development of public transport system also would help to decrease congestion. An illustrative example of this are measures of so-called “Big Moscow transport renovation” when bus lines invented as well as new circles of Moscow Metro underground.
In conclusion, my opinion is that problems related to traffic and congestion has had an adverse effect on citizens of large cities in Russia due to carbon dioxide emission and impossibility to get somewhere in the city on time. After analyzing the subject, it has become quite evident that that best approach to tackle the problems mentioned above is to increase taxes and develop public transport by city government. Although it is impossible to avoid hazards completely, these are concrete steps which can be taken to reduce negative aspects of congestion they are having on city life. Not only would this make the life of city-dwellers healthy, but also easy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | gillmandeep0260 | 84 | view |
| 2017-08-18 | Eugene88 | 11 | view |
- Some people think that people travel more these days.Why is it happening? Is it a positive or a negative development? 61
- During a recent plane journey, you sat next to a businessman who owns a chain of restaurants. You talked to him and he suggested that you should contact him about a possible job in one of his restaurants.Write a letter to this businessman. In your letterr 81
- One problem faced by almost every large city is traffic congestion.What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 73
- Some people think that young people are influenced more by their friends than by their parents or teachers Do you agree or disagree 87
- The use of cell phones while driving should be strictly forbidden To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun throat seems to be countable; consider using: 'many throats'.
Suggestion: many throats
...a result, city-dwellers are suffered of many throat and lung diseases. Another matter is th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, likewise, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29585798817 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98721058027 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565088757396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0829701561 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.294117647 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0775063213649 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259688602043 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268108285462 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487820095441 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202314355419 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.