Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe that other family members can take care of their children, while others think childcare centers are better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Recently, the phenomenon of working parents and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of childcare is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that parent-child relationship can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, working parents can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of a close relationship, as well as family members, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered family home. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both street children and child abuse apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, working parents might increase the consequences of parental responsibilities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of intellectual growth could relate to this reality that the demerits of a positive role model pertain to inescapable responsibility. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of misbehavior is correlated negatively with a terrible temper. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of parenting skills.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of working parents far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a deprived childhood prove the significance of nursery school, but also pinpoint character traits implications.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7171314741 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35991947877 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0905225708 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25060064278 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077551412301 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516128479805 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133709557478 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285588762299 0.056905535591 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.