Nowadays modern gadgets are widely used by young people and the use of these products reduces their creativity Do you agree or disagree

Science has definitely blessed us with the revolutionary inventions, which have made our lives more convenient as compared to past. In this context, the role of latest equipment, gadgets and gizmos is undeniable. However, I completely agree with the notion that somehow, these gadgets have severely restricted the creative skills of people as dependency on the machines amputate their thinking abilities.

To begin with, nowadays, almost every work is performed by machines, whether in our homes or at workplaces. Earlier, as most of the work was usually done manually, people used to find or think about the new creative ideas to do that in easy way. Consequently, they would go for some innovative techniques to make their hectic lives more comfortable. So, creativity had a common existance in their daily lives.

Moving to the next justification, presently, we have technology to provide us answers for all our problems. We can refer to online resources for our queries as well as to satisfy our curiosities. People need not pressurised their minds to get ideas. With a single click, one can jump into the ocean of knowledge as internet has abundance of links to offer you wide range of viewpoints. Moreover, latest software and application are designed in such a way, which can really replace the thinking ability of human brains. For instance, some of the software are able to create different musical notes which assist the lyricists to prepare music for a particular song.

Additionally, the main victim of loss of creativity are the children as they are exposed to the gadgets at very tender age. As a result, they do not develop many soft skills and their creativity gets sabotaged. Solving puzzles, improving handwriting and painting hobbies are being replaced by playing video games.

On the other hand, some people have the opinion that gadgets, in reality, boost up our skills rather than diminishing those. Conversely, I still believe that technology has hit our human capabilities to think by going out of the way.

To sum up, I assume, gadgets should be used for our convenience but they should not supersede the very important human instinct of thinking extraordinarily.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (6 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...ared to past. In this context, the role of latest equipment, gadgets and gizmos is undeni...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ves more comfortable. So, creativity had a common existance in their daily lives....
^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
...r you wide range of viewpoints. Moreover, latest software and application are designed i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... ability of human brains. For instance, some of the software are able to create different m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther than diminishing those. Conversely, I still believe that technology has hit ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, well, as to, for instance, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14484679666 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85367038063 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607242339833 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4855817154 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2105263158 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84210526316 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142737692099 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405256181848 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451742518378 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707056166923 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313870218984 0.056905535591 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.