Nowadays people make new friends through social networks and internet chat groups. Some people think this is good. Others think that face-to-face interaction is essential. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
No one can argue that social media applications drastically have changed the lives of millions of people in the modern world. Even though, I believe that there are more positive aspects to using them this essay will debate both sides of the argument.
Some might say that with technology development interpersonal communications have begun to lack genuine connections and via-screen interactions will never be able to replace the real human presence in someone’s life. Supporters of this argument usually bring to attention that with the rise of the social media networking a lot of people start to avoid participating in the life of local communities and are much more invested in browsing online, discovering new pen pals instead of living in real-time and facing real issues such as church meetings, government protests and so on.
On the other hand, recent Harvard University studies have shown that in the USA most of the students who were forced to move away from families to pursue further education felt much happier and felt less abandon in general as they used such applications as FaceTime and Skype on the frequent basis to reconnect with their families and friends. Hence, the general level of stress of such respondents was dramatically lower compared to the peers who ignored the recent technological innovations and saw their loved ones only during the weekends or holidays. Moreover, such websites as LinkedIn and Facebook are helping millions of people to discover new possibilities and reach new horizons by finding friends and love all around the world in the way it was never imagined before.
In conclusion, it is true that face-to-face communications will always remain an important part of everyday life for human beings, nonetheless, new technologies which are created to improve it will definitely stay around in the foreseeable future. And, it is up to everyone how to manage the perfect balance of using all of those applications and maintain a healthy approach to life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | Bhawna Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | faridashh | 89 | view |
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children’s sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.Write a letter to the com 84
- Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind, waves, and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal, oil, and gas that we use to power our cities and transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Obesity is now a major epidemic in North America. What can be done to tackle this increasingly common problem? 89
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate. Which do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 84
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last 10 years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, in conclusion, in general, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20245398773 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90271099409 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628834355828 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0863005154 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 188.444444444 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2222222222 20.7667163134 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138581400744 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513250972504 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405501027589 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792879772745 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226099769438 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.0946893788 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.