Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Technology has modified our interpersonal interactions both in positive and negative ways. While positive changes have been attained to a significant extent, still the negative impacts are prominent enough to dwarf the positive.
In yesteryears, the usual ways of communication and making new relations were face-to-face contact or through writting. Currently the technology has revolutionised the human interpersonal interactions by indroducing cutting-edge communication devices such as mobile phones, internernets etc. Today, it has imparted its impacts on relationships in business, education and social life. Firstly, tremendous development in the field of telecommunication and Internet has allowed the business-people to communicate with each other instantly from different cities or countries. Beside this, the internet has also modified the way of customers communications of the businesses organisations. Using technology they are now directly communicating with their customers to advertise their produts or to take their instant feedbacks. Secondly, services like skype, has created a different dimension of relationships between teachers and students. For example, the student now can take video lesson with a teacher from a different city or country. Finally, online social platforms like facebook, Twitter, Google plus have allowed people to communicate and share contents among each others no matter whatever the distence is. Through these platforms, a lot of people who share a common interests are exchanging their feelings as well as audio-visual contents. Furthermore, some people now depends on social medias to find new friends as well as their life partners.
However, there are plethora of evidences why the new horizon of connecting mode that evolved from the advancement of the communication technology should be considered as a negative development. In fact, It is adversely affecting our domestic as well as social relationships. Owing to the attraction towards the utopian virtual world some technology savvy people specially the adolescents are becoming isolated and showing more interest in virtual relationships over the real ones. This is creating void spaces between our interpersonal relationships which is a threat to our social as well as the familial structures.
To conclude, I pen down recapitulating that the basic modes of relationship making process have been extensively mutated by technology but not to a positive direction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | ashita | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | AYM Mostafa | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | chinmay011 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | rakeshsoni86 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | parinataneja | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...such as mobile phones, internernets etc. Today, it has imparted its impacts on re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8347107438 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36523901236 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6053663757 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2680951214 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715067231925 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038728981783 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141853392624 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031509004218 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.