Many people believe that reducing garbage saves the nation. It is necessarily true. Nowadays, Garbage is collected by house keeping persons and are deposited as huge mountains in common place. In my view, Garbage accumulation should be reduced at home itself to avoid further assimilation in another area.
Most importantly, one of the reasons are our method of saving garbage instead of reducing them.
Garbage is littered in pathways, schools, colleges and other common areas. Although, People find Dustbins nearby, People throw them in road. Further, every individual has the idea that government staff would clean outside premises and its not our responsibility. Even vegetable wastes are thrown away from markets into road, instead of collecting them in recycle bins. Moreover, when birthday parties or wedding parties are conducted, Water bottles or paper plates are spit in the pathway place after the function is completed. Although function has finished so grandly, but the garbage collected are not given preference. Consequently, Every individual should be responsible to throw away bottles are plates in dustbin. Scientists found Paper plates or Plastic bags are found without any damage under ground even after 30 years. Even animals like cow, goat are eating paper because of throwing them in garbage. This is not advisable for healthy environment, as we are using cow's milk for daily diet.
On contrary, in ancient ages, Individual home exists and garbage are not deposited in dustbins. Instead they used in other ways of recycling them. they were recycled as manure to plants or food for animals at home. We can reuse most of food wastes by depositing them in our garden pits, later this can be recycled as natural fertilizer to the plants. Government should create orders to mandate this responsibility in early stages of school, by making children to practice throwing waste in Dustbins only. Early, the ideas are sowed in children's mind, the behavior of throwing would be stopped by them later. Similarly, this practice is effectively initiated and followed in Japan where each child is responsible for their activity in school or home. Nevertheless, Government should take steps as to penalize the individual if they are seen dumping house wastes,Sanitary wastes, market wastes in public areas. People should assist government by following mission such as swach bharath (cleaner India). Government should inform collectors or local counselors to actively conduct camps so that they train people by sufficient camps and follow-up with them by reviewing their actions a month or later.
In conclusion, Every individual are responsible to effectively use garbage management and recycle them as manure, fertilizer for plants. Another way could be to lit waste in fire, and drop the perished waste in sea. This efficient method is originated by Singapore. Country is known for its cleanliness because of this approach. So, if we exploit them with fire, it saves our future planet. Earth would be free from plastics if we follow this approach.
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 11
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 11
- Task2:Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 22
- Some people claim that government should take action to ensure people have a healthy lifestyle. Others however disagree that people should decide them selves which way they prefer to live their life. To what extent you agree and suggest your opinions. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... garbage are not deposited in dustbins. Instead they used in other ways of recycling th...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...y used in other ways of recycling them. they were recycled as manure to plants or fo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 385, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mandating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: mandating
...plants. Government should create orders to mandate this responsibility in early stages of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 862, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Sanitary
...al if they are seen dumping house wastes,Sanitary wastes, market wastes in public areas. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f this approach. So, if we exploit them with fire, it saves our future planet. E...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, as to, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29508196721 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70945967455 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 176.041082164 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543032786885 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 804.6 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 16.0721442886 193% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0219554296 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3548387097 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7419354839 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32258064516 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0691271784046 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0193163179821 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240427496987 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.041367356282 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169842581331 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.