People are now living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short period of time and then thrown away. What are the main problems associated with it. What can be done about?
People have recently become highly concerned about the conservation of the planet. Today’s world is characterized by the ubiquitous consumption of products with a short life cycle such as plastic bags and packages. This essay will discuss the primary issues of the practice in question and propose a feasible resolution to it.
One of the most detrimental ramifications of irresponsible plastic usage is considered to be the soil, water and air contamination. Proceeding from this, the enormous volumes of plastic are being thrown away to the ocean on a daily basis which appears to be the reason behind the intense water pollution. Moreover, not only does it provoke the aquatic problems but also entails the emission of noxious gas due to the attempts to burn the excessive landfills. For instance, the recent environmental report issued by the United Nations reflected the 250% increase of the global level of hazardous waste on Earth over the last 40 years.
To address the above mentioned issue the government ought to exercise their power to regulate the production of non-biodegradable materials. This is because otherwise the majority of producers will continue the omniscient fabrication of plastic which is supposed to be fatal for various species inhabiting the planet. Therefore, unless deterred at the current stage, further pollution will heavily affect both flora and fauna in the coming years.
For example, the prohibitive measures implemented by the Sweddish authorities in 2013 to reduce plastic manufacturing resulted in a significant improvement of the local environment, according to the Sweddish National Bureau of Statistics.
This essay shed light on the major problems triggered by the single-use products and offered a viable solution to resist the environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-23 | Vlad_english | 84 | view |
- In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution on land and in the water so people think they should be banned Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that death penalty is unacceptable in contemporary society Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 89
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that this way of punishment is not acceptable in today s world Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Ohers say that this punishment is unacceptable in contemporary world Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... waste on Earth over the last 40 years. To address the above mentioned issue the...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Sweddish National Bureau of Statistics. This essay shed light on the major probl...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to resist the environmental issues.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47142857143 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06823754502 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646428571429 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4862937915 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10568876846 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342344804549 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028075091366 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508908992063 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241158470336 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... waste on Earth over the last 40 years. To address the above mentioned issue the...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Sweddish National Bureau of Statistics. This essay shed light on the major probl...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to resist the environmental issues.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47142857143 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06823754502 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646428571429 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4862937915 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10568876846 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342344804549 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028075091366 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508908992063 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241158470336 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.