People nowadays work hard to buy more things This has made our lives generally more comfortable but many traditional values and customs have been lost and this is a pity To what extent do you agree or disagree

Presently individuals work hard for their ambitions, this has made our livelihood much comfortable but the materialism have deteriorated our traditional values and principles. In subsequent paragraphs I will highlight my agreement to words this above mentioned statement.

Documents with several justifications can be placed in favour of my opinion. Firstly, the increasing materialism is affecting the family interaction. These days people tend to work over time as well as on the festivals in order to attain extra money rather than, to enjoy the occasions and spend nights with their beloved family members. For example many staff workers operate on their work places during the festivals isolating their families due to which the bond between them is affected and may lead to separations and divorces.
Secondly the rising working culture as a responsible for dissatisfaction among individuals. As someone work hard and get promoted, he or she further tends to aim high and never enjoy their present. To achieve their dream life is all their primary concern is located, they do not care about the present. This type of mentality affects a person‘s behaviour as well as mental health because if for some reason they fail to achieve their ambitions. The materialism would make them feel failed and would be not worth living and these type of people may give less importance to relations as well as lack in respecting others.
To conclude lack of family and traction and dissatisfaction make the materialism negative play affect individuals traditional values legitimate.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95246608787 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8154956373 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.833333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145546710931 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520799530311 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669493739858 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100933271422 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816893131714 0.056905535591 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.