People prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced ones Why do you think this happens Should the government support local filmmakers financially

Essay topics:

People prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced ones. Why do you think this happens? Should the government support local filmmakers financially?

There has been a progressive rise in the auience for foreign films. It has been observed that people like watching international cinema more than the local one. This essay will first discuss the reason for this rising trend and further emphasis why the government should aid the local fil industry monetarily.
Cinema is souure of entertainment and people like watching larger than life images that are way beyond reality. This is achieved by using special effects which requires significant investment into latest technology and the foreign film industry invest generously into research and development. Apart from this, international film makers invest heavily into various forms advertisement and film promotion, which helps them capture audiences of all ages across the globe.
On the contrary, the native film makers has a serious dearth of capital which not onl discourages them to produce quality cinema at par with the rest of the world but also limits their audience share. Government should address this anamoly at the earliest and provide immediate finanial assistance to local movie makers in the form of interest free loans and tax breaks. Apart from improving the stature and reach of local films, this will also prove to be a major source of revenue generration as local cinema would highlight native traditions and culture in a positive way and promoting it will increase governemnt income through tourism.
In conclusion, government should immediately address the financial needs of the capital hungry local film industry which on the one hand would ensure raising quality and reach of local cinema and on the other hand would promote local culture and generate revenue through inreased tourism.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-02-14 Prabhp 84 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 56 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 67 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 61 view
2020-02-14 Prabhp 84 view
Essays by user Prabhp :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'into the latest'.
Suggestion: into the latest
...s which requires significant investment into latest technology and the foreign film industr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...highlight native traditions and culture in a positive way and promoting it will increase governem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich on the one hand would ensure raising quality and reach of local cinema and on...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31617647059 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56792456893 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5772890844 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.6 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302114380141 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116726002787 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663375679811 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18559481152 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572842104761 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'into the latest'.
Suggestion: into the latest
...s which requires significant investment into latest technology and the foreign film industr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...highlight native traditions and culture in a positive way and promoting it will increase governem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich on the one hand would ensure raising quality and reach of local cinema and on...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31617647059 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56792456893 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5772890844 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.6 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302114380141 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116726002787 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663375679811 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18559481152 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572842104761 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.