People prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced ones. Why do you think this happens? Should the government support local filmmakers financially?
It has been observed that society is more inclined towards watching international movies rather than their natve films. This essay will first discuss the reasons for foreign films being appreciated more than the locally produced ones and it will further discuss why it is essential for the government to provide monetary assistance to local movie makers.
The two most important reasons that influence people to watch foreign cinema are the high tech effects used by movie makers along with excessive advertisements and marketing campaigns by film producers. The foreign producers and directors not only enjoy a great deal of support from governemt in terms of substantial amount of funds necessary for implementing in movies with extraordinary technological and 3D effects but also invest money in promoting their films , thus, attracting the attention of audience from all age groups. To elucidate, majority of movies such as Avengers and Jurassic Park use latest technolog and equiments along with three-dimensional graffics to create a hype and craze for multinational films.
In order to increase the viewership of national motion pictures, government should support the local filmakers by providing them with funds together with low interest loans and tax rebateds, so that they can present larger than life movies on big screen which are appealing to the eyes of local people. Furthermore, governemnt should finance the training of local directors and screen writers under the guidance and mentorship of foreign filmakers in order to enhance their skills and knowledge in making wonderful movies
In conclusion, people love to watch foreign films to experience remarkable visual and audio effects, however, they can be motivated to watch their national movies by not only provding the native movie makers with adequte financial aids but also supporting them monetarily to get coaching and directions from international filmakers.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write about the following topic:Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience. 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter•explain why you have moved•describe the new house•invite your friend to come and visitWrite at l 73
- In many countries around the world shopping has turned into a form of entertainment rather than a way of getting what people need Discuss the reason for this trend Is it a positive or negative development 88
- People who live in large cities face a range of problems in their daily life.What are the most significant of these problems?How can these problems be tackled? 78
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter:•say why he/she would not enjoy going to college•expl 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...so invest money in promoting their films , thus, attracting the attention of audie...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e local filmakers by providing them with funds together with low interest loans a...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and knowledge in making wonderful movies In conclusion, people love to watch fore...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49163879599 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85665694281 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.2975951904 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.385926372 49.4020404114 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 234.571428571 106.682146367 220% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.7142857143 20.7667163134 206% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264605407349 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117050603313 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748465174135 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16008053149 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659635431095 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.8 13.0946893788 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.39 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 11.3001002004 184% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.45 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.1190380762 186% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 10.7795591182 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...so invest money in promoting their films , thus, attracting the attention of audie...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e local filmakers by providing them with funds together with low interest loans a...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and knowledge in making wonderful movies In conclusion, people love to watch fore...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49163879599 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85665694281 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.2975951904 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.385926372 49.4020404114 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 234.571428571 106.682146367 220% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.7142857143 20.7667163134 206% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264605407349 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117050603313 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748465174135 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16008053149 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659635431095 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.8 13.0946893788 197% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.39 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 11.3001002004 184% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.45 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.1190380762 186% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 10.7795591182 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.